Archive for the ‘Online basics’ Category
Lessons I learned from an in-depth online reporting project
Over the course of two and a half months, I worked on an in-depth project examining gender at Whitworth University. I focused on building the project specifically for the web and used it as a chance to take on the role of a multi-skilled, multi-platform journalist that is being asked for in the field today. To find out more about the project or what I did, read the previous post.
Here is what I learned through the process of using multiple tools and skills in this project.
Read more »
Applying what I learned: ‘The Women’
While those of you who have been following this blog may know that this fall I took on an independent study to look at how the internet has influenced journalists’ roles, many of you may not know what I’ve been up to this spring.
In the final semester of my undergraduate education, I sought to apply the lessons I learned this fall. I learned that journalists need to be multi-skilled and multi-platform, so I developed a project in which I could demonstrate that.
Over the course of two and a half months, I worked on an in-depth project examining gender at Whitworth University. Nearly 60 people were interviewed. I wrote more than 50 articles of varying lengths both news and features, took and edited video clips, created databases, posted documents, created a graphic element, did the coding for the Web page, added links and did some of the photo work for the project.
Today it is finally complete, with only a few finishing touches needed. Check it out: The Women
In an upcoming post, I will debrief and talk about what I learned through this experience.
‘Journalism 2.0′: Raising the bar for journalists
“If you are a journalist, or thinking of becoming one, you may have already noticed this: They are raising the ante on what it takes to be a journalist.”
Phil Meyer began a book with this observation in 1991. Think about how much technology has changed since that statement was written and how much more his statement is true today.
This is one of the premises of Mark Briggs book project about digital literacy for journalists titled “Journalism 2.0: How to survive and thrive.”
Briggs covers topics ranging from the basics of the Web and the tools invovled to how to report for the Web, produce audio, video and photos, and put it all together.
While the book contains a lot of technical assistance and training, it also provides a basic understanding of the changes the Internet is bringing for journalists and their audience. Here is a little bit about what Briggs’ book has to say on the subject.
Series highlights skills writer wishes he learned in j-school
With how rapidly the field of online journalism is changing, journalism education is sometimes having a hard time adapting.
MediaShift‘s Mark Glaser wrote a post in April 2007 about journalism schools remaining stuck in a legacy media mindset.
After contemplating Glaser’s post, Mac Slocum responded through a min-series in Poynter’s E-media Tidbits about what skills he wishes he learned in journalism school.
These were the three skills Slocum said would be valuable:
1. How to be a researcher and guide
2. How to generate traffic
3. How to lead and moderate communities
Note that the skills Slocum highlights are not specific programs or coding languages and that multimedia is absent from the list.
I’m curious what Web skills do you wish you were learning or learned in journalism school? What skills are being taught?
‘Web Journalism’ Part 5: How it works in practice
This is the final post in a five part series looking at James Glen Stovall’s book “Web Journalism: Practice and Promise of a New Medium” published in 2004 by Pearson Education, Inc. I will be examining several textbooks about online journalism and posting highlights.
To see how the ideas of online journalism are being put into practice, Stovall spent some time in an Internet newsroom and then reflected on the practice and promise of the Web for the future.
Stovall visited the newsroom at MSNBC.com, a partnership between Microsoft and NBC as well as collaborations with other media entities. His observations about the newsroom are from over four years ago, so they may not still be exactly the same. However, the concepts he pulled are probably still consistent.
At MSNBC.com, deadlines can be every minute because people expect the latest information, even if it only happened a minute ago, Stovall observed.
The front page of the site is the most important part, Stovall writes. At the time, the organization had a front page editor on duty 24 hours a day, keeping the site organized and fresh.
Human resources, screen size and user inclination put a check on the idea of the Web’s unlimited capacity, Stovall writes.
Stovall observed that despite the technology, words and storytelling were still carefully considered, showing that journalism had not, at that point, changed in that respect.
He points out that the Web is still in its infancy and questions are still being explored. Putting all of the many tools related to online journalism in one reporter’s “backpack” is a lot to balance. The question of whether a journalist can actually use all of the tools on hand to cover a story is still up for debate.
Stovall’s book is packed with a lot more information and ideas than were highlighted in these posts. If you want to read the book for yourself, copies are available at booksellers online such as Amazon.com and Barnes & Noble.
Read other posts in this series:
-Part 1: The basics of what the Web means for journalism
-Part 2: Gathering, synthesizing and sharing on the Web
-Part 3: What the Web means for other storytelling forms
-Part 4: Design, engagement and the law online
‘Web Journalism’ Part 4: Design, engagement and the law online
Want to read the book for yourself? Copies are available at booksellers online such as Amazon.com and Barnes & Noble.
Read other posts in this series:
-Part 1: The basics of what the Web means for journalism
-Part 2: Gathering, synthesizing and sharing on the Web
-Part 3: What the Web means for other storytelling forms
Nuggets from the college media conference
‘Web Journalism’ Part 3: What the Web means for other storytelling forms
This is post three of five on James Glen Stovall’s book “Web Journalism: Practice and Promise of a New Medium” published in 2004 by Pearson Education, Inc. I will be examining several textbooks about online journalism and posting highlights.
Other forms of storytelling besides text are also greatly expanded by the Web in terms of their capacity and demands, Stovall writes in chapters on photojournalism, graphics journalism and audio and video.
Capacity
The Web provides greater breadth and depth for alternative storytelling forms.
Photographers who used to become irritated when publications ran out of space, an editor selected a “wrong photo” or the size of the image didn’t do it justice now have the ability to provide more images and in different formats. The Web’s ability to hold more images through galleries, audio slideshows and other forms also produces a demand for more, increasing photojournalists’ workloads, Stovall writes.
This also means that the Web presents two new challenges for photojournalists: load time and screen size.
Graphics, which Stovall writes is the most underdeveloped part of journalism, has an opportunity to expand on the Web. The Web has no limits on graphics and what they are able to contain. Like stories, they can be continually updated and added to as new information develops. Layering and organization are key to this process.
People are still experimenting with ways to produce graphics for the Web in the areas of type-based, chart-based and illustration-based graphics.
The Web allows broadcast journalists to expand their stories into longer pieces and segments and provide more detail, Stovall writes. The space available allows more video to be streamed online from a variety of sources than can be done on television.
Demands
The demand for information when and how people want it is also translated to graphics, images and video.
Photographers and editors do not have as long to make decisions on images. Photographers now have to think more about storytelling, combining images with other means such as audio, video or graphics, and assess the editing process to beware of manipulation.
As cameras switched to digital, they became lighter, easier to use and less expensive. This means photography is becoming more egalitarian and in some cases reporters are taking their own cameras on assignments, Stovall writes. The change in technology also can take editing out of the hands of photographers to editors who specifically work with programs like Adobe Photoshop.
Graphics journalists have to learn new programming and pick up animation. They also have to think more visually and sometimes less text-based than print, Stovall said. Immediacy plays a role in that people expect to see visual representations as soon as events happen (for example, a map of the effected area right after an earthquake).
The Web demands broadcast journalists to become print journalists, but it also works in reverse. It is expected that news sites provide content in a variety of forms. Broadcasters have to learn to tailor their text for both the ear and the eye to translate to the Web.
The next post in this series will look at what Stovall has to say about design, engaging audiences and media law when translated to the Web.
Want to read the book for yourself? Copies are available at booksellers online such as Amazon.com and Barnes & Noble.
Read other posts in this series:
-Part 1: The basics of what the Web means for journalism
-Part 2: Gathering, synthesizing and sharing on the Web
Leave a Comment